Detailed Insight into Photocatalytic Inactivation of Pathogenic Bacteria in the Presence of Visible-Light-Active Multicomponent Photocatalysts

The use of heterogeneous photocatalysis in biologically contaminated water purification processes still requires the development of materials active in visible light, preferably in the form of thin films. Herein, we report nanotube structures made of TiO2/Ag2O/Au0, TiO2/Ag2O/PtOx, TiO2/Cu2O/Au0, and TiO2/Cu2O/PtOx obtained via one-step anodic oxidation of the titanium-based alloys (Ti94Ag5Au1, Ti94Cu5Pt1, Ti94Cu5Au1, and Ti94Ag5Pt1) possessing high visible light activity in the inactivation process of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and other pathogenic bacteria—E. coli, Clostridium sp., and K. oxytoca. In the samples made from Ti-based alloys, metal/metal oxide nanoparticles were formed, which were located on the surface and inside the walls of the NTs. The obtained results showed that oxygen species produced at the surface of irradiated photocatalysts and the presence of copper and silver species in the photoactive layers both contributed to the inactivation of bacteria. Photocatalytic inactivation of E. coli, S. aureus, and Clostridium sp. was confirmed via TEM imaging of bacterium cell destruction and the detection of CO2 as a result of bacteria cell mineralization for the most active sample. These results suggest that the membrane ruptures as a result of the attack of active oxygen species, and then, both the membrane and the contents are mineralized to CO2.


Introduction
Photocatalysts are substances that can initiate or accelerate a chemical reaction using light energy.They are widely used in various applications, including environmental remediation, hydrogen production, and organic synthesis [1,2], as well as microbial elimination [3].While many photocatalysts are based on single-component materials such as titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), there is also ongoing research into developing more complex photocatalysts using multi-component alloys.
One of the most promising forms of nanostructures active in photocatalytic processes is TiO 2 nanotubes (NTs).Among other factors, NTs could enable better control of chemical and physical properties.By reducing the dimensions to the nanoscale, not only does the surface area increase significantly but the electronic structure also undergoes significant changes (e.g., due to the occurrence of the quantum effect or the curvature of the surface) [4].These NTs can be synthesized using various methods, such as hard matrix, hydro/solvothermal, electrospinning, and anodic oxidation methods, obtaining a material in the form of a powder or a thin layer [5].Improvement of visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 NTs arrays could be obtained via doping with non-metals and metals [6], the deposition of noble metal nanoparticles [7] and quantum dots [8], the formation of semiconductor heterojunctions [9,10], or atomic layer deposition [11].
A very interesting approach nowadays involves alloying semiconductor materials to create photocatalysts with extended light absorption, improved charge carrier dynamics, and antibacterial properties.Researchers have explored the alloying of titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) with other semiconductors like silver oxide (Ag 2 O) [13] or copper oxide (CuO) [12] to improve photocatalytic activity, extend the absorption range to the visible light region, and increase its disinfection efficiency.Alongside metal oxides, plasmonic metals like gold or platinum can strengthen the photocatalytic process and increase visible light absorption through the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect [25].The excited electrons and enhanced electric fields produced in the presence of the NPs can promote the photocatalytic reactions that convert solar energy into chemical energy.
In the case of photocatalysts in the form of NTs formed from alloys that consist of more than two metals, there are not many studies published on these materials [20,21,23,24,[26][27][28][29].It was confirmed that obtaining NTs from complex alloys in the electrochemical oxidation process is possible, and moreover, new structures are active in the photocatalytic processes and influence bacterial inactivation.Ternary nanostructured photocatalysts originating from alloys offer several advantages over other photocatalysts in terms of scalability.The unique structure and composition of ternary photocatalysts allow for tunable properties, chemical stability, and reusability, which are essential for practical applications.In terms of chemical stability, ternary photocatalysts often exhibit improved chemical stability compared to their single-component counterparts.This is due to the formation of a more robust and less-prone-to-degradation material, which can lead to longer-lasting photocatalysts.The stability of photocatalysts originating from metal alloys can also contribute to their reusability as they can maintain their photocatalytic activity even after multiple cycles of use [30].The process of scaling up in terms of the anodization method is relatively easy to perform as it only requires an increase in the area of electrodes, and there are fewer process parameters to consider compared to other methods such as in hydrothermal methods.It can also be a cost-effective method as it requires fewer steps of synthesis than the solvothermal method [31,32].But the most important feature is the complex structure obtained during a single-stage process of formation, which is money-and time-saving.
In the literature, there are many examples of E. coli inactivation by various types of photocatalysts in the presence of visible light [3,33]; however, the impact of the photocatalytic process on S. aureus, which is a big problem in healthcare facilities and communities [34], has not been so intensively studied.Moreover, studies on the combination of TiO 2 /Ag 2 O or TiO 2 /Cu 2 O with noble metal NPs that may affect the inactivation of bacteria in visible light were not found in the literature.Therefore, the authors decided to obtain new hybrid NT layers via simple anodization of multicomponent alloys composed of 94% wt. of titanium, 5% wt. of silver or copper metal, and 1% wt. of gold or platinum used as a substrate to obtain visible-light-active-and ready for multiple use-NT layers composed of the expected TiO 2 , Ag 2 O, Ag 0 , Cu 2 O, Au 0 , PtO x , or Pt 0 .The impact of alloying titanium dioxide with other semiconductors like silver oxide or copper oxide has been primarily investigated on S. aureus (MSSA-methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus), and subsequently on other harmful bacteria that are important for the human environment such as E. coli, Clostridium sp., and K. oxytoca.Promising results hold potential for applications in various fields, including medical devices, antimicrobial coatings, and environmental remediation.

Synthesis of Nanotubes
Ti foil and Ti alloys were cut into 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm pieces.Initially, samples were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min with acetone, isopropanol, methanol, and deionized water, in that order.The final step of the cleaning process was air steam drying.Moreover, two electrodes were used in the anodization process: prepared alloys as the working electrode and platinum mesh as the cathode, with a distance of 2 cm between them.The electrolyte solution was composed of ethylene glycol (98 vol %), deionized water (2 vol %), and NH 4 F (0.09 M).The stirring of electrolyte was applied (500 rpm).We immersed 2 cm of Ti foil and Ti alloys in 150 mL of electrolyte.The anodic oxidation process was controlled by applying a voltage of 30 V to the working electrode (the current density decreased from 25 to 2 mA/cm 2 ) for 60 to 90 min.The samples were then sonicated in deionized water for the last preparation phase, dried in an air stream at 80 • C for 24 h, and then calcined for an hour at 450 • C (heating rate of 2 • C/min).Detailed information is given in Table 1.

Characterization Systems
To understand the morphology of the obtained structures, SEM and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were used.A PHI 5000 VersaProbeTM (Ulvac PHI, Chigasaki, Japan), spectrometer and a JOEL JSM-7610F (JOEL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) device were employed in the experiment, respectively.Furthermore, transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi H-800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to determine the interior structure of NTs.A TEM sample was prepared by scratching the surface with a fresh razor blade and transferred onto a carbon coated copper supporting grid.The phase composition was checked using a room-temperature powder X-ray PANalytical X'Pert Pro MPD diffractometer (CuK α λ 1.5406 Å).The surface composition was analyzed via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a PHI 5000 VersaProbeTM spectrometer (ULVAC-PHI, Chigasaki, Japan) with monochromatic Al Kα irradiation (hν = 1486.6eV).The binding energy (BE) scale of all detected high-resolution (HR) spectra was referenced by setting the BE of the aliphatic carbon peak (C-C) signal to 284.8 eV.The photoluminescence (PL) measurements were taken at room temperature with an LS-50B Luminescence Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer LLC, Shelton, USA) with a Xenon discharge lamp as an excitation source and a special detector: an R928 photomultiplier.The sample's surface was exposed to 360 nm of excitation radiation at a 90 • angle.Using reference samples of barium sulphate, the diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) of the NTs was measured using a Shimadzu UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (UV 2600) (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan).Using a set scanning speed of 250 nm/min, spectra were measured in a range of 300-700 nm at room temperature.

Measurement of Photocatalytic Bacteria Inactivation
The goal of the experiment was to investigate bacteria inactivation in the presence of photocatalysts.We performed (1) a photocatalysis test in the presence of a photocatalyst, light λ > 420 nm, and two control tests; (2) a dark process with the presence of a photocatalyst and a lack of light; and (3) a photolysis process that involved a lack of photocatalyst and the presence of light λ > 420 nm.A quartz reactor with a volume of 10 mL, a 1000 W Xenon Lamp (Oriel 66021, Oriel Instruments, Sterling, MA, USA), and a cutoff filter (>420 nm) were used to carry out the microorganism inactivation process.Irradiation intensity was measured in the position where light entered the photoreactor via an optical power meter (HAMAMATSU, C9536-01, Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan) and equaled 100 mW/cm 2 .The following bacteria species were used in the experiment: E. coli, S. aureus, K. oxytoca, and Clostridium sp.Characteristics of the bacteria used in the experiment are included in Supplementary Materials (Table S1).
The dedicated protocol was followed to prepare all species of bacteria for the experiment.They were removed from LB medium via centrifugation at 2739× g for 10 min; then, they were suspended in sterile 1 × PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , 1.8 mM KH 2 PO 4 , pH 7.4, at 25 • C) with selected OD 600 to achieve a final concentration of CFU/mL 10 3 -10 4 .The prepared photocatalytic layer was placed in the quartz reactor together with the bacteria suspension (8 mL).The reactor with a cooling system was located on a stirrer (500 rpm) and irradiated for 60 min.Starting with the reference collection, samples of 1 mL have been taken every 20 min.Serial dilutions in 1 × PBS from 10 −1 to 10 −10 were made from each sample.A total of 10 µL of the prepared dilutions was sown onto the agar medium, the plates were incubated for 16 h, and the grown colonies were counted.After incubation, grown colonies on agar plates were counted manually or using automatic colony counters.The number of bacterial colonies was then multiplied by 1/dilution and divided by the sample volume (in mL).CFU per unit volume (mL) of the original sample was calculated using the dilution factor and the number of colonies counted.The following formula to determine cultivated microorganisms was applied: CFU/mL = number of colonies x total dilution factor/volume of culture plated in ml (CFU denotes the colony forming unit).
To perform the other control tests, the same setup was used.For the photolysis process (no catalyst control), only bacteria strains were placed in the reactor (without photocatalyst).Finally, for the experiment with no light control, the lamp was switched off.Additionally, during the bacteria inactivation processes, 1 mL samples of bacteria were taken for TEM imaging.Working on Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with high resolution (HRTEM), the bacteria pictures were created to present the effects of photocatalytic processes.
To identify the irradiation range at which the most active sample maintained the capacity to inactivate microorganisms, a special setup was prepared where a sample with the photocatalyst and 8 mL of bacteria S. aureus were put in the quartz photoreactor with a cooling system and a magnetic stirrer bar.A total of 1 mL of solution was collected as a reference sample, and consecutive samples (1 mL) were taken after 2 h and 4 h.Using 1000 W Xe lamp (LSH602) and monochromator (MSW306) (LOT-Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA) the sample was irradiated with the following wavelengths: 420, 440, 460, 480, and 500 nm.Irradiation intensity (W) was measured for individual wavelengths with an optical meter (ILT2400, International Light Technologies, Peabody, MA, USA).
The CO 2 evolution during bacteria irradiation under visible light was studied to test the possibility of decomposition, i.e., mineralization.A photoreactor made of Teflon with a quartz window with a volume of 15 mL equipped with a cooling jacket, a 1000 W Xenon Lamp (Oriel 66021) (ArtisanTG, Champaign, IL, USA), and a cutoff filter (>420 nm) was used to carry out the microorganism inactivation process.The reactor's temperature during experiments was maintained at 10 • C using a thermostat.The reactor was filled with 8 mL of 1 × PBS solution with Staphylococcus aureus at a concentration of CFU/mL = 4 * 10 4 .Before the experiment, the headspace of the photoreactor was purged with nitrogen gas with 10 dm 3 /h velocity for 30 min in the dark while the solution was mixed with a magnetic stirrer bar.A total of 200 µL of the gas samples was taken after 0, 120, and 240 min of the process and then introduced into a gas chromatograph (Thermo Scientific TRACE 1300-GC, Waltham, MA, USA) that was equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD).1.The NT layers obtained from titanium alloys were characterized by relatively similar thicknesses (length of NTs) and inner diameters ranging from 2.3 to 2.6 µm and from 54.3 to 58.8 nm, respectively.If we compare these parameters with the geometric dimensions of pristine NT layers, also given in Table 1, we can conclude that the small addition of other metals to titanium does not have a significant impact on the process of forming these nanotubular structures, and this is in line with the literature [24,29].Furthermore, anodization of titanium substrates containing other metals such as Ag, Au, and Pt caused the formation of NPs, which are embedded within the entire surface of the NT layers; i.e., NPs are embedded on the upper surface, along the outer tubes, as well as inside and on their bottom, as shown in Figure 2.     TEM images (Figure 3 and Figure S1) also confirmed the presence of NPs in the layer of TiO 2 NTs, where the nanoparticles (in the size range of 5-30 nm) had a spherical shape and were located on the surface and inside the NTs and were embedded in the NT walls.While in the layers obtained from Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 and Ti 94 Cu 5 Pt 1 alloys, the nanoparticles show size of 8.2 ± 2.1 nm and 7.2 ± 1.5 nm, respectively, in the samples Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs and Ti 94 Cu 5 Au 1 _30V NTs, they show a much larger size, i.e., 14.1 ± 3.0 nm and 18.9 ± 6.2 nm, respectively.Nanomaterials 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 24 TEM images (Figures 3 and S1) also confirmed the presence of NPs in the layer of TiO2 NTs, where the nanoparticles (in the size range of 5-30 nm) had a spherical shape and were located on the surface and inside the NTs and were embedded in the NT walls.While in the layers obtained from Ti94Ag5Pt1 and Ti94Cu5Pt1 alloys, the nanoparticles show size of 8.2 ± 2.1 nm and 7.2 ± 1.5 nm, respectively, in the samples Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs and Ti94Cu5Au1_30V NTs, they show a much larger size, i.e., 14.1 ± 3.0 nm and 18.9 ± 6.2 nm, respectively.004), ( 200), (105), and (211) planes, which are particular to the anatase phase of TiO 2 [35].The reflections at 2θ values of around 35, 38, 40, and 54 • originated from the hexagonal metallic Ti substrate [36].Furthermore, the XRD patterns of NT layers created from different Ti-alloy sheets exhibited peaks of tetragonal AgTi 3 and tetragonal CuTi 3 , as marked by the vertical bars: pink and red, respectively.These peaks, like the reflections of titanium, originated from the Ti-alloy substrates [26].

Raman Spectroscopy
Figure 5a shows Raman spectra of pristine and modified NT layers prepared from Ti and Ti alloys.Raman spectra of pristine and modified NT layers contained five signals assigned directly to the anatase crystalline [37] form, which were located at 143, 196, 391, 514, and 634 cm −1 and are derived from Eg(1), Eg(2), B1g, A1g, and Eg(3) active modes, respectively [38].The Raman spectra recorded for both types of NTs layers (pristine and modified) were almost the same.No signal from Ag or Cu or Pt and Au or their oxide forms was recorded in the spectrum, which may be due to their very small quantity in the nanotube layer.However, the location of the Eg(1) for the NT layers obtained from titanium alloys differs in comparison with the NT layer prepared from pure Ti substrate, as shown in Figure 5b.The Eg(1) mode is typically ascribed to the symmetric stretching vibration of O-Ti-O in TiO2 materials [39].In modified NT layers, a slight blue shift in the position of the Eg(1) mode was observed in comparison with pristine NTs.This could be related to the non-stoichiometry inducing lattice vibrations.The appearance of oxygen

Raman Spectroscopy
Figure 5a shows Raman spectra of pristine and modified NT layers prepared from Ti and Ti alloys.Raman spectra of pristine and modified NT layers contained five signals assigned directly to the anatase crystalline [37] form, which were located at 143, 196, 391, 514, and 634 cm −1 and are derived from Eg (1) , Eg (2) , B 1g , A 1g , and Eg (3) active modes, respectively [38].The Raman spectra recorded for both types of NTs layers (pristine and modified) were almost the same.No signal from Ag or Cu or Pt and Au or their oxide forms was recorded in the spectrum, which may be due to their very small quantity in the nanotube layer.However, the location of the Eg (1) for the NT layers obtained from titanium alloys differs in comparison with the NT layer prepared from pure Ti substrate, as shown in Figure 5b.The Eg (1) mode is typically ascribed to the symmetric stretching vibration of O-Ti-O in TiO 2 materials [39].In modified NT layers, a slight blue shift in the position of the Eg (1) mode was observed in comparison with pristine NTs.This could be related to the non-stoichiometry inducing lattice vibrations.The appearance of oxygen vacancies, resulting from introducing modifiers, can also cause the Ti-O-Ti disturbances observable as a displacement of the Eg (1) peak towards higher wavenumbers [40].

DRS and Photoluminescence
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the UV-Vis range for all prepared NT layers is presented in Figure 6a.The strongest photoabsorption of light, regardless of the type of substrate used during anodizing, was observed for the range of UV irradiation up to 380 nm typical for TiO2 NTs in the crystallite form of anatase, which is caused by the electronic transition between bands in the anatase structure [41].Additionally, in the cause of pristine NT layers, the photoabsorption band in the visible range with a maximum at approximately 500 nm could be attributed to the presence of sub-bandgap states as a result of nanotubular morphology [42].The shapes of the photoabsorption curves in the visible range recorded for NTs layers obtained from titanium alloys differ significantly compared to the pristine NT layers.The photoabsorption in the visible light of modified NT layers is mainly caused by the narrowband oxide form of Ag and Cu [13,43].Furthermore, an absorption band with a maximum of approximately 540 nm was observed in the case of NT layers containing Au NPs, which could be related to the presence of Au NTs within NT layers [44].

DRS and Photoluminescence
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the UV-Vis range for all prepared NT layers is presented in Figure 6a.The strongest photoabsorption of light, regardless of the type of substrate used during anodizing, was observed for the range of UV irradiation up to 380 nm typical for TiO 2 NTs in the crystallite form of anatase, which is caused by the electronic transition between bands in the anatase structure [41].Additionally, in the cause of pristine NT layers, the photoabsorption band in the visible range with a maximum at approximately 500 nm could be attributed to the presence of sub-bandgap states as a result of nanotubular morphology [42].The shapes of the photoabsorption curves in the visible range recorded for NTs layers obtained from titanium alloys differ significantly compared to the pristine NT layers.The photoabsorption in the visible light of modified NT layers is mainly caused by the narrowband oxide form of Ag and Cu [13,43].Furthermore, an absorption band with a maximum of approximately 540 nm was observed in the case of NT layers containing Au NPs, which could be related to the presence of Au NTs within NT layers [44].The photoluminescence spectra recorded in the range of 300-700 nm for all prepared NT layers is presented in Figure 6b.Emissions with the maximum at approximately 420, 445, 480, and 530 nm can be assigned to the TiO68-, surface defects, oxygen vacancies, and radiative recombination [45,46].In general, lower PL intensity is ascribed to the lower rate of charge carriers recombination [47].In this respect, NT layers obtained on titanium alloys were characterized by slower charge carriers recombination process compared to pristine NTs.On the other hand, among the modified samples, this process was the most effective in samples prepared from Ti94Ag5Pt1 and Ti94Ag5Au1 substrates.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
The surface chemical composition of anodized Ti-and Ti-alloy sheets was identified from survey XPS spectra (Figure S2) and determined after analysis of high-resolution (HR) XPS spectra, and the results are summarized in Table 2.The HR XPS spectra of metal alloys components, presented in Figure 7, confirm the presence of oxidized states of Ti, Ag, Cu, and Pt.Two chemical states of titanium (identified as Ti 4+ and Ti 3+ ), identified in the Ti 2p spectra (BE of Ti 2p3/2 peak close to 458.8 eV and 457.3 eV, respectively) confirm the effective formation of TiO2] [48,49].The Ag 3d5/2 signals at 367.6 eV and 368.5 eV in the Ag 3d spectra of the Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs Ti94Ag5Pt1_30V samples are related to Ag-Ox and Ag-alloy, respectively [48].The Cu 2p spectra of Ti94Cu5Pt1_30V NTs and Ti94Cu5Au1_30V NTs samples reveal the Cu 1+ state of copper oxide (Cu 2p3/2 signals at 932.4 eV [48,49]).The Pt 4f spectra of the Ti94Cu5Pt1_30V NTs and Ti94Ag5Pt1_30V NTs samples are overlapping with the broad Ti 3s satellite.However, the Pt states, shown by the Pt 4f7/2 signals at BE 71.5 and 73.0 eV, can be addressed to the Pt-Tix [48,50] and Pt-Ox surface species [48].The Au 4f spectra of Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs and Ti94Cu5Au1_30V NTs samples (Au4f7/2 and Au4f5/2 signals at 83.4 eV and 87.1 eV, respectively) are related to the electronegative (Au δ− ) state [51,52].The O/Ti atomic ratios for all Ti-alloy samples are close to or slightly higher than the corresponding values for Ti NTs (Table 2).However, the relative proportions of metals in the surface region of NTs are significantly different from The photoluminescence spectra recorded in the range of 300-700 nm for all prepared NT layers is presented in Figure 6b.Emissions with the maximum at approximately 420, 445, 480, and 530 nm can be assigned to the TiO68-, surface defects, oxygen vacancies, and radiative recombination [45,46].In general, lower PL intensity is ascribed to the lower rate of charge carriers recombination [47].In this respect, NT layers obtained on titanium alloys were characterized by slower charge carriers recombination process compared to pristine NTs.On the other hand, among the modified samples, this process was the most effective in samples prepared from Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 and Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 substrates.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
The surface chemical composition of anodized Ti-and Ti-alloy sheets was identified from survey XPS spectra (Figure S2) and determined after analysis of high-resolution (HR) XPS spectra, and the results are summarized in Table 2.The HR XPS spectra of metal alloys components, presented in Figure 7, confirm the presence of oxidized states of Ti, Ag, Cu, and Pt.Two chemical states of titanium (identified as Ti 4+ and Ti 3+ ), identified in the Ti 2p spectra (BE of Ti 2p 3/2 peak close to 458.8 eV and 457.3 eV, respectively) confirm the effective formation of TiO 2 ] [48,49].The Ag 3d 5/2 signals at 367.6 eV and 368.5 eV in the Ag 3d spectra of the Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 _30V samples are related to Ag-Ox and Ag-alloy, respectively [48].The Cu 2p spectra of Ti 94 Cu 5 Pt 1 _30V NTs and Ti 94 Cu 5 Au 1 _30V NTs samples reveal the Cu 1+ state of copper oxide (Cu 2p 3/2 signals at 932.4 eV [48,49]).The Pt 4f spectra of the Ti 94 Cu 5 Pt 1 _30V NTs and Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 _30V NTs samples are overlapping with the broad Ti 3s satellite.However, the Pt states, shown by the Pt 4f 7/2 signals at BE 71.5 and 73.0 eV, can be addressed to the Pt-Tix [48,50] and Pt-Ox surface species [48].The Au 4f spectra of Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs and Ti 94 Cu 5 Au 1 _30V NTs samples (Au4f 7/2 and Au4f 5/2 signals at 83.4 eV and 87.1 eV, respectively) are related to the electronegative (Au δ− ) state [51,52].The O/Ti atomic ratios for all Ti-alloy samples are close to or slightly higher than the corresponding values for Ti NTs (Table 2).However, the relative proportions of metals in the surface region of NTs are significantly different from the corresponding values of starting alloy materials (Table 3).This is a result of different surface segregations of Ti, Ag, Cu, and Au atoms during the anodic treatment of Ti-alloy samples, resulting in different surface reactivities with oxygen and CO.The data in Table 2 show that the Au content on the surface of the most catalytically active Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs sample is higher than that of the initial alloy sample (see Ti/Au and Ag/Au ratios), indicating the surface segregation of Au both in relation to Ti and Ag during the anodization process.the corresponding values of starting alloy materials (Table 3).This is a result of different surface segregations of Ti, Ag, Cu, and Au atoms during the anodic treatment of Ti-alloy samples, resulting in different surface reactivities with oxygen and CO.The data in Table 2 show that the Au content on the surface of the most catalytically active Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs sample is higher than that of the initial alloy sample (see Ti/Au and Ag/Au ratios), indicating the surface segregation of Au both in relation to Ti and Ag during the anodization process.The experiment was performed to check the efficiency of bacterial inactivation in the presence of the obtained photocatalyst.To prove this, three types of experiments were defined.First, we checked whether the photocatalyst had an effect on bacteria without light application.We assumed that some metal ions can have an impact on the bacteria's cell walls.This analysis showed that nanotubes are not harmful to bacteria when they are not exposed to irradiation.Only in the case of two samples, Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs in K. oxytoca solution and Ti 94 Cu 5 Au 1 NTs in E. coli and Clostridium sp., did the number of bacteria slightly decrease.This effect could be caused by the influence of silver or copper oxides located on the surface of nanotubes made of TiO 2 /Ag 2 O/Au 0 and TiO 2 /Cu 2 O/Au 0 .In previous experiments in the presence of TiO 2 /Cu 2 O/CuO nanotubes, we checked whether and how many Cu ions are transferred directly from the sample to the bacterial solution, and the result confirmed the absence of such a process [12].
To confirm that photolysis does not influence the microorganisms, bacterial solutions without photocatalyst were examined with visible range irradiation (λ > 420 nm) for 60 min.It was proven that there is no impact of light on E. coli, S. aureus, K. oxytoca, and Clostridium sp. in these conditions.
The focus of the final series of studies was on assessing how visible-light-driven photocatalysis affected the survival of bacteria in the 60 min cycle.The effectiveness of inactivation for all bacteria, showing the influence of the type of formed heterostructure, is presented in Figure 8.The most promising results were obtained for samples Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs and Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 NTs.When bacteria were exposed to irradiation over Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs, E. coli and S. aureus bacteria were the most effectively destroyed (90% and 99.9%, respectively), and Clostridium sp.demonstrated a modest drop (92.8%).In the case of Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 NTs, the results were slightly lower; E. coli and S. aureus and K. oxytoca were 96.5%, 90%, and 82.5% destroyed, respectively.When analyzing each bacterium, E. coli was degraded in the visible light range in the presence of Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 NTs by 96.5% efficiency, Ti 94 Cu 5 Au 1 NTs by 93.3%, and Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs by 90%.Experiments for S. aureus show a level of degradation for Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs of 99.9%, somewhat less for Ti 94 Cu 5 Pt 1 NTs (i.e., 97%), and 91% for Ti 94 Cu 5 Au 1 NTs.The analysis conducted for Clostridium sp.presented a high influence of Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs on bacteria (92.8% degradation), 66.7% for Ti 94 Cu 5 Pt 1 NT, and a lower impact of Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 NTs (47%) and Ti 94 Cu 5 Au 1 NTs (40%).The bacterium that is the least affected by the photocatalysis process and the tested materials is K. oxytoca.The highest degradation rate was 82.5% for Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 NTs; however, for other materials, it was less than 35%.
process and the tested materials is K. oxytoca.The highest degradation rate was 82.5% for Ti94Ag5Pt1 NTs; however, for other materials, it was less than 35%.When we analyze the composition of the most active photocatalysts, Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs and Ti94Ag5Pt1_30V NTs, it is known that both samples contain silver.XPS analysis confirmed the existence of Ag phases in amounts of 0.47 and 0.23 atomic %, and these different amounts of Ag2O can affect the charge transfer and recombination processes, which are crucial for photocatalytic activity.Moreover, the surface plasmon resonance effect of Au NPs can enhance the absorption of visible light, which is not efficiently absorbed by the semiconductor alone, thus increasing the photocatalytic activity.Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs and Ti94Ag5Pt1_30V NTs also show significantly reduced photoluminescence (of similar value) compared to pristine TiO2 NTs, as well as the remaining samples.The reduced value of the photoluminescence maxima suggests that the electron-hole recombination process is slower, which might increase the photocatalytic properties of these materials as well.XPS analysis also shows that there is more atomic % of Ag than Cu, which can lead to more effective bacterial inactivation for certain bacteria.Silver ions are more potent than copper ions at lower concentrations, which may contribute to the higher inactivation rates observed with higher atomic When we analyze the composition of the most active photocatalysts, Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs and Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 _30V NTs, it is known that both samples contain silver.XPS analysis confirmed the existence of Ag phases in amounts of 0.47 and 0.23 atomic %, and these different amounts of Ag 2 O can affect the charge transfer and recombination processes, which are crucial for photocatalytic activity.Moreover, the surface plasmon resonance effect of Au NPs can enhance the absorption of visible light, which is not efficiently absorbed by the semiconductor alone, thus increasing the photocatalytic activity.Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs and Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 _30V NTs also show significantly reduced photoluminescence (of similar value) compared to pristine TiO 2 NTs, as well as the remaining samples.The reduced value of the photoluminescence maxima suggests that the electron-hole recombination process is slower, which might increase the photocatalytic properties of these materials as well.XPS analysis also shows that there is more atomic % of Ag than Cu, which can lead to more effective bacterial inactivation for certain bacteria.Silver ions are more potent than copper ions at lower concentrations, which may contribute to the higher inactivation rates observed with higher atomic percentages of Ag [53].
The different activity observed per bacterium can be the result of differences in cell wall structure between Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium sp.) and Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca), which could highly affect their susceptibility to photolysis.Gram-negative bacteria typically have an outer membrane that may provide additional protection against photolysis compared to Gram-positive bacteria.However, some Gram-positive bacteria generate endospores, which are resistant to external environmental factors.Moreover, the bacterium Klebsiella oxytoca can create an additional protective layer, a polysaccharide coating that prevents degradation.Variations in metabolic pathways and the ability to regenerate cellular components among bacterial species may also affect their susceptibility to photolysis.Bacteria with more robust antioxidant systems or DNA repair mechanisms are expected to be less susceptible to photolysis-induced damage.Certain bacteria may produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) (Klebsiella oxytoca) or biofilms that could shield them from the effects of photolysis.Additionally, certain bacterial species may have mechanisms to detoxify reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during photolysis.Variations in bacterial genetics, including the presence and expression levels of specific genes involved in stress response or DNA repair pathways, could also contribute to differences in sensitivity to photolysis.
During the study of bacterial degradation under visible light, the Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs sample was used an average of 25 times for both processes involving photocatalysts ((1) photocatalysis test in the presence of a photocatalyst and light λ > 420 nm; (2) a dark process in the presence of a photocatalyst and a lack of light).The results of the photocatalysis processes performed in the presence of the Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 NTs sample in eight reuse cycles are gathered in Figure S3.There was no drop in photoactivity; therefore, it can be assumed that these materials are stable over time.
Many studies have been described in the literature regarding the inactivation of E. coli using visible light in the presence of various types of photocatalysts, including Au/TiO 2 [54], Ag/TiO 2 [55], Cu/TiO 2 [56], AgVO 3 /g-C 3 N 4 , BiVO 4 [57], and many more.On the contrary, studies on S. aureus elimination have not been conducted so extensively.This is likely due to the characteristics of this bacterium, as certain strains exhibit antibiotic resistance, making their elimination more challenging.Table 4 presents examples of photocatalysts that demonstrate high bacterial killing efficiency during the photocatalysis process.Among others, Moon et al. [58] reported the development of visible light antibacterial TiO 2 nanotubes modified with Au and Pt NPs.Their study demonstrated that Au-modified TiO 2 nanotubes exhibited a higher inactivation efficiency, achieving a rate of <50% at an initial bacterial concentration of 10 5 CFU/mL.On the other hand, the data for modification of NT with Pt NPs revealed an inactivation efficiency of <40%.A composite material in the form of MoS 2 /TiO 2 nanotubes was utilized in a photocatalytic process for the inactivation of S. aureus [18].The process was carried out for a duration of 150 min, leading to a remarkable inactivation efficiency of 100%.Interestingly, a sol-gel method was employed to synthesize a visible-light-active material consisting of Cu-doped TiO 2 [59].It was found that the addition of a small amount of Cu into the TiO 2 crystal lattice enhanced thermal stability and antimicrobial properties.Cu-TiO 2 achieved complete inactivation of S. aureus within just 30 min of visible light exposure.In conclusion, the existing literature, aside from the research conducted by the authors, lacks examples of the utilization of ternary photocatalysts in the form of NTs for the elimination of S. aureus.Furthermore, while many of the materials highlighted in Table 4 demonstrate high process yields, their sample preparation and process duration are significantly more complex compared to the materials presented in the present study.The photocatalysts analyzed in this research were prepared using a single-stage anodization process, enabling easy acquisition of visible-light-active structures while also offering reusability for multiple cycles.To determine the range of irradiation in which the most active sample still showed the ability to inactivate bacteria, we conducted experiments wherein S. aureus bacteria, in the presence of the Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs sample, were irradiated with wavelengths of 420, 440, 460, 480, and 500 nm.The results are presented in Figure 9a.The measurements demonstrated that Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs are characterized by strong photoactivity in the visible range up to 460 nm, with a value of 99.4% after 4 h which diminished, reaching a value of 0% at 500 nm.This phenomenon can be explained by the insufficient power of irradiation above 500 nm to effectively induce the generation of charge carriers in Ag 2 O. Essentially, irradiation nearer to the UV spectrum possesses higher energy, which seems to be crucial for the effective excitation of Ag 2 O and subsequent generation of charge carriers.Additionally, to explain the mechanism of the photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria in the field of visible irradiation, measurements of CO 2 generated during the bacterial inactivation process were also carried out.An increase in the amount of CO 2 generated was observed during the 4 h measurement (Figure 9b, Table S2), which can prove that carbon dioxide production by S. aureus bacteria may be a result of bacterial mineralization or metabolic and respiratory processes [69,70].It is known that TiO2 alone cannot be excited in the visible light (λ > 420 nm).The reason for this is its wide gap energy, with the value of 3.2 eV for anatase, which correlates with wavelength of 387 nm.The irradiation from the visible range is not able to excite electrons from the valence band of TiO2 as the radiation energy is smaller than the energy bandgap.However, the anodization of the Ti-Ag alloy led to the formation of not only TiO2 but also Ag2O (with a bandgap as narrow as 1.3 eV [13]) [35], which, due to the narrow energy bandgap, can be excited by visible light.Moreover, it is confirmed that plasmon resonance is responsible for the visible activity of wide-bandgap semiconductors It is known that TiO 2 alone cannot be excited in the visible light (λ > 420 nm).The reason for this is its wide gap energy, with the value of 3.2 eV for anatase, which correlates with wavelength of 387 nm.The irradiation from the visible range is not able to excite electrons from the valence band of TiO 2 as the radiation energy is smaller than the energy bandgap.However, the anodization of the Ti-Ag alloy led to the formation of not only TiO 2 but also Ag 2 O (with a bandgap as narrow as 1.3 eV [13]) [35], which, due to the narrow energy bandgap, can be excited by visible light.Moreover, it is confirmed that plasmon resonance is responsible for the visible activity of wide-bandgap semiconductors [71,72].Ag 2 O from the synthesized heterojunction becomes excited while absorbing visible light energy and generates a pair of free electrons (e−) in the conduction band (CB) and holes (h+) in the valance band (VB) that can migrate to the surface of the photocatalyst, where reactions take place.As shown in Figure 10, the electrons move from the Ag 2 O to the TiO 2 CB because the CB of Ag 2 O has a greater negative potential than the CB of TiO 2 [73]; then, electrons transfer to the PtO x , causing better electron-hole separation [24,74,75].The free electrons whose reduction potential is sufficient (more negative −0.18 eV) react with oxygen molecules to form superoxide ions (O 2 •− ).The potential of holes in the VB of Ag 2 O is too low (0.20 eV) to generate strong oxidants such as • OH; thus, it is proposed that these holes can directly participate in the process of bacteria inactivation [76].However, it is known that the efficiency of oxidation reactions in photocatalysis is influenced by the oxidative potential of the holes [77].In the case of Ag 2 O, the oxidative potential of the holes is low (0.20 eV); therefore, they can only have a minor effect on bacterial inactivation.Several scenarios can be true in terms of what happens to bacteria when photocatalysis is involved.In the course of photocatalytic reactions, bacteria cells can be rendered inactive by a variety of mechanisms, including membrane disruption (rupture of the cell membrane), cell wall exposure (exposure of cellular components), and ROS attack on the cells [78].It should be noted that photocatalyst intrinsic and surface features (e.g., bandgap energy, specific surface area, crystallite/particle size, aggregation, surface charge, defects distribution, and impurities content) are equally important for the overall antimicrobial action.The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles modified by noble metals has been reported in many studies, presenting several pathways of bacteria damage.For structures involving silver NPs, suggested mechanisms include adsorption of Ag cations on a negatively charged bacterial cell wall [79], interaction with enzymes' thiol groups [80], and the possibility of membrane breakdown [81].Because of its strong photocatalytic activity (ROS production) [82] and capacity to impair electron transport in cells [83], the mechanism involving Au-modified titania has also been studied.For cooper NTs, the presumed antimicrobial mechanisms involve copper ion accumulation inside bacteria [84], the denaturation of surface protein structure [85], but also the generation of oxidative stress in bactericidal processes by absorbed copper ions [86].All of the mentioned reports on antimicrobial activity can be helpful in discussing the possible mechanism; however, they provide information only for binary complexes.The presented results indicate that the mechanism of bacterial inactivation consists of two steps.The first step, the shorter one, covered the bacterial cell wall, and in Gram-negative bacteria, the outer cell membrane was also covered, and the inactivation took place as a result of the action of oxygen radicals (O 2 •− ) produced during the photocatalytic process.The low amount of CO 2 indicates that only some of the bacteria's protective elements have been compromised.It can be assumed that at this stage, the bacteria try to repair themselves and create a mechanism by which to defend themselves against radicals [87].Since only later in the process (after approx.40 min) was a significant increase in the efficiency of bacterial inactivation found, it can be concluded that at this point, the bacteria stopped defending themselves, and the second stage, mineralization, began in the inactivation mechanism.The release of carbon dioxide may also indicate bacteria metabolic and respiratory processes.Radicals attacked the cell wall and membrane and slowly caused the oxidation of more complex compounds such as liposaccharides (LPS) [88].
In both cases, the high-performance material contained silver in various forms.Therefore, it has been assumed that the membranes of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are exposed to Ag NPs because of the surface oxidation process.Electrostatic interaction between the composite particles and the bacterial cell wall may also cause inactivation.What is more, the diameter of the metallic nanoparticles can influence the process because smaller nanoparticles with a greater surface area during their interaction with bacterial cells lead to the better penetration of cytoplasm compared to larger particles [89].The slightly lower effectiveness for E. coli (Gram-negative bacteria) could result from the structure of the microorganisms' membranes as they are built from phospholipid and lipopolysaccharide layers, which makes them harder to penetrate.
For selected alloys, TEM images of bacteria were taken after 60 min of the photocatalytic process.Figure 11 shows pictures of bacteria in the presence of the most active nanomaterials: Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V NTs and Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt1_30V NTs.The images clearly show damage to the bacteria's cell walls and nucleus.
could result from the structure of the microorganisms' membranes as they are built from phospholipid and lipopolysaccharide layers, which makes them harder to penetrate.
For selected alloys, TEM images of bacteria were taken after 60 min of the photocatalytic process.Figure 11 shows pictures of bacteria in the presence of the most active nanomaterials: Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs and Ti94Ag5Pt1_30V NTs.The images clearly show damage to the bacteria's cell walls and nucleus.

Figure 1
Figure1presents HRSEM images of pristine and modified NT layers.It can be seen that regardless of the composition of the titanium alloy, the obtained NT layers are characterized by homogeneity, and their top surface is open (without the remains of the initiation layer).All NT layers consist of well-developed tubes placed side by side.The geometrical parameters of the obtained films determined based on SEM images are presented in Table1.The NT layers obtained from titanium alloys were characterized by relatively similar thicknesses (length of NTs) and inner diameters ranging from 2.3 to 2.6 µm and from 54.3 to 58.8 nm, respectively.If we compare these parameters with the geometric dimensions of pristine NT layers, also given in Table1, we can conclude that the small addition of other metals to titanium does not have a significant impact on the process of forming these nanotubular structures, and this is in line with the literature[24,29].Furthermore, anodization of titanium substrates containing other metals such as Ag, Au, and Pt caused the formation of NPs, which are embedded within the entire surface of the NT layers; i.e., NPs are embedded on the upper surface, along the outer tubes, as well as inside and on their bottom, as shown in Figure2.

Nanomaterials 2024 , 24 Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Top-view and selected cross-sectional HRSEM images of pristine and modified NT layers prepared from Ti and Ti alloys.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Top-view and selected cross-sectional HRSEM images of pristine and modified NT layers prepared from Ti and Ti alloys.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Top-view and selected cross-sectional HRSEM images of pristine and modified NT layers prepared from Ti and Ti alloys.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Selected HRSEM images showing the location of nanoparticles within the NT layers prepared from Ti alloys.The red circles indicate NPs.Figure 2. Selected HRSEM images showing the location of nanoparticles within the NT layers prepared from Ti alloys.The red circles indicate NPs.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Selected HRSEM images showing the location of nanoparticles within the NT layers prepared from Ti alloys.The red circles indicate NPs.Figure 2. Selected HRSEM images showing the location of nanoparticles within the NT layers prepared from Ti alloys.The red circles indicate NPs.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. TEM images of modified NT layers prepared from Ti alloys.Exemplary nanoparticles of different sizes are marked by arrows.

Figure 4 Figure 3 .
Figure 4 displays the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of NT layers created using Ti and various Ti-alloy sheets.The XRD patterns for both the pristine and modified samples revealed the existence of TiO2 anatase and Ti metal reflections, which were marked by the vertical bars: blue and black, respectively.The reflections at 2θ values of

Figure 4
Figure 4 displays the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of NT layers created using Ti and various Ti-alloy sheets.The XRD patterns for both the pristine and modified samples revealed the existence of TiO 2 anatase and Ti metal reflections, which were marked by the vertical bars: blue and black, respectively.The reflections at 2θ values of approximately 25, 38, 48, 53, and 54 • corresponded to (101), (004), (200), (105), and (211) planes, which are particular to the anatase phase of TiO 2[35].The reflections at 2θ values of around35, 38, 40, and 54  • originated from the hexagonal metallic Ti substrate[36].Furthermore, the XRD patterns of NT layers created from different Ti-alloy sheets exhibited peaks of tetragonal AgTi 3 and tetragonal CuTi 3 , as marked by the vertical bars: pink and red, respectively.These peaks, like the reflections of titanium, originated from the Ti-alloy substrates[26].

24 Figure 5 .
Figure 5.General Raman spectra of pristine and modified NT layers (a) and Raman spectra showing Eg(1) active modes (b).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.General Raman spectra of pristine and modified NT layers (a) and Raman spectra showing Eg (1) active modes (b).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) DRS and (b) photoluminescence spectra of pristine and modified NT layers.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) DRS and (b) photoluminescence spectra of pristine and modified NT layers.

Nanomaterials 2024 , 24 Figure 9 .
Figure 9. (a) Effectiveness of inactivation of S. aureus during the photocatalytic reaction in the presence of Ti94Ag5Au1_30V alloy at variable wavelengths (monochromatic light source); (b) chromatogram showing CO2 generation after 4 h visible light irradiation of S. aureus in the presence of Ti94Ag5Au1_30V sample.First, the excitation mechanism should be mentioned to understand, comprehensively, what happens to bacteria during photocatalytic experiments where radical oxygen species (ROS) are formed.Based on literature data, Figure 10 reveals a schematic excitation mechanism under visible irradiation, where one of the two most active photocatalysts in bacterial inactivation, TiO2/Ag2O/PtOx, was examined.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. (a) Effectiveness of inactivation of S. aureus during the photocatalytic reaction in the presence of Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V alloy at variable wavelengths (monochromatic light source); (b) chromatogram showing CO 2 generation after 4 h visible light irradiation of S. aureus in the presence of Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V sample.

First, the
excitation mechanism should be mentioned to understand, comprehensively, what happens to bacteria during photocatalytic experiments where radical oxygen species (ROS) are formed.Based on literature data, Figure 10 reveals a schematic excitation mechanism under visible irradiation, where one of the two most active photocatalysts in bacterial inactivation, TiO 2 /Ag 2 O/PtO x , was examined.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. (a) Effectiveness of inactivation of S. aureus during the photocatalytic reaction in the presence of Ti94Ag5Au1_30V alloy at variable wavelengths (monochromatic light source); (b) chromatogram showing CO2 generation after 4 h visible light irradiation of S. aureus in the presence of Ti94Ag5Au1_30V sample.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.The simplified excitation mechanism of TiO2/Ag2O/PtOx NTs under visible light and the proposed stages of photocatalytic bacteria inactivation.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.The simplified excitation mechanism of TiO 2 /Ag 2 O/PtO x NTs under visible light and the proposed stages of photocatalytic bacteria inactivation.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.TEM images of bacteria after 0 and 60 min of visible light irradiation with (a) Ti 94 Ag 5 Au 1 _30V and (b) Ti 94 Ag 5 Pt 1 _30V NTs photocatalysts.The red circles indicate the disintegration of the cell wall/membrane, i.e., the visible cracks and damage to the bacteria around the cell.The red arrows mark the destruction of the cell interior, i.e., the destruction of the structure of internal organelles, and the visible scattered or damaged cytoplasmic structures or fragmentation of genetic material.

Table 1 .
Sample label, main anodization conditions, and dimensions of nanotubes prepared at different Ti-alloy sheets.

Table 2 .
Elemental composition (in atomic %) in the surface layer of Ti NTs, Ti94Ag5Au1_30V NTs, Ti94Cu5Pt1_30V NTs, Ti94Cu5Au1_30V NTs, and Ti94Ag5Pt1_30V NTs composites evaluated via XPS analysis.Sample Label Elemental Composition (Atomic %.) Ti O C N Cu Ag Pt Au O/Ti

Table 3 .
Surface metal composition of Ti NTs and different NT layers prepared from Ti-alloy sheets evaluated via XPS analysis.

Table 4 .
Photocatalysts used for S. aureus inactivation under visible light.